<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Mayday Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mattsmarketingblog.com/general/google-mayday-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mattsmarketingblog.com/general/google-mayday-update/</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing Made Easy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 20:48:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://mattsmarketingblog.com/general/google-mayday-update/comment-page-1/#comment-3748</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 21:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattsmarketingblog.com/?p=1045#comment-3748</guid>
		<description>The best information I have is that Google has regularly made dramatic changes to their algorithms that initially have an equally dramatic effect on rankings etc, but that during the months that follow such a change, they integrate the new algorithm into their standard set and things roughly go back to normal. Clearly change has occurred but it is rarely, if ever, radical in the medium to long term.

I know for sure that many previously high-ranked sites have taken a hit since the latest algorithm came into play, but I believe that most sites will re-achieve their previous positions in the months ahead. That is historically what has occurred and there is little or no evidence to suggest that will not happen this time around. At the &quot;edges&quot; of high ranking, some sites will get hit but most will survive unharmed.

Having said all that, I do believe that carefully crafted and well researched sites have the longest legs - in all areas of the net. Keyword focused sites &amp; domains will always do well in any case, unless knocked by human review, but quality with keyword research will always win out.

The key with Google is never to panic - you have to sit out their changes &amp; if you are pursuing a sound strategy anyway, it will not harm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best information I have is that Google has regularly made dramatic changes to their algorithms that initially have an equally dramatic effect on rankings etc, but that during the months that follow such a change, they integrate the new algorithm into their standard set and things roughly go back to normal. Clearly change has occurred but it is rarely, if ever, radical in the medium to long term.</p>
<p>I know for sure that many previously high-ranked sites have taken a hit since the latest algorithm came into play, but I believe that most sites will re-achieve their previous positions in the months ahead. That is historically what has occurred and there is little or no evidence to suggest that will not happen this time around. At the &#8220;edges&#8221; of high ranking, some sites will get hit but most will survive unharmed.</p>
<p>Having said all that, I do believe that carefully crafted and well researched sites have the longest legs &#8211; in all areas of the net. Keyword focused sites &amp; domains will always do well in any case, unless knocked by human review, but quality with keyword research will always win out.</p>
<p>The key with Google is never to panic &#8211; you have to sit out their changes &amp; if you are pursuing a sound strategy anyway, it will not harm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Delton</title>
		<link>http://mattsmarketingblog.com/general/google-mayday-update/comment-page-1/#comment-3571</link>
		<dc:creator>Delton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 05:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattsmarketingblog.com/?p=1045#comment-3571</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s Google, as M.Cutts stated, the company makes appx 400
changes to their algorithms/yr.

1 Page/post, add videos 1/page.  Surly you can hook the video to the post &amp; average 20 to 25 pages/site.

And rather you believe this or not=spinners work.

Just use a little creativity with titles.  And use good practices w/SEO.  My Opinion &amp; I&#039;m Sticking w/It
Thanks Matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s Google, as M.Cutts stated, the company makes appx 400<br />
changes to their algorithms/yr.</p>
<p>1 Page/post, add videos 1/page.  Surly you can hook the video to the post &amp; average 20 to 25 pages/site.</p>
<p>And rather you believe this or not=spinners work.</p>
<p>Just use a little creativity with titles.  And use good practices w/SEO.  My Opinion &amp; I&#8217;m Sticking w/It<br />
Thanks Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda</title>
		<link>http://mattsmarketingblog.com/general/google-mayday-update/comment-page-1/#comment-3525</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 08:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattsmarketingblog.com/?p=1045#comment-3525</guid>
		<description>Matt,
thanks this is useful.  I am quite new to Affiliate Marketing, so wanted to know .. does this sort of thing happen quite often ?  Google changing the rules of the game ? 

And...is this the reason you are going to direct more time to promoting phystical products (less competition, longer tail of product keyword terms) ?

Best Wishes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt,<br />
thanks this is useful.  I am quite new to Affiliate Marketing, so wanted to know .. does this sort of thing happen quite often ?  Google changing the rules of the game ? </p>
<p>And&#8230;is this the reason you are going to direct more time to promoting phystical products (less competition, longer tail of product keyword terms) ?</p>
<p>Best Wishes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Carter</title>
		<link>http://mattsmarketingblog.com/general/google-mayday-update/comment-page-1/#comment-3510</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Carter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 11:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattsmarketingblog.com/?p=1045#comment-3510</guid>
		<description>Hey James

You make some great points, thanks for adding value to the blog!

Cheers

Matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey James</p>
<p>You make some great points, thanks for adding value to the blog!</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Pruitt</title>
		<link>http://mattsmarketingblog.com/general/google-mayday-update/comment-page-1/#comment-3507</link>
		<dc:creator>James Pruitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 02:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattsmarketingblog.com/?p=1045#comment-3507</guid>
		<description>I agree. I think the smallest site i own has 40 pages. now they all don&#039;t rank page one, but quite a few of them do. What i noticed,( and probably i see this more than some people having sites over 100 pages) is that some of my pages that have never made a blip on the Google radar are all of a sudden on page 1 or 2, while other pages that have been on page 1 for over a year have totally disapeared off the map. 

It all comes down to building sites with a lot of valuable content, and keep adding to them. some pages will stick and some wont.
At the same time, I agree with Spunky. Write for your readers, and don&#039;t rely totally on Google for your Traffic. Although Google is my single biggest traffic source, I still only get about 20% of my traffic through them, so I took a small hit, but it wasnt devastating to my business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. I think the smallest site i own has 40 pages. now they all don&#8217;t rank page one, but quite a few of them do. What i noticed,( and probably i see this more than some people having sites over 100 pages) is that some of my pages that have never made a blip on the Google radar are all of a sudden on page 1 or 2, while other pages that have been on page 1 for over a year have totally disapeared off the map. </p>
<p>It all comes down to building sites with a lot of valuable content, and keep adding to them. some pages will stick and some wont.<br />
At the same time, I agree with Spunky. Write for your readers, and don&#8217;t rely totally on Google for your Traffic. Although Google is my single biggest traffic source, I still only get about 20% of my traffic through them, so I took a small hit, but it wasnt devastating to my business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francisco Acosta</title>
		<link>http://mattsmarketingblog.com/general/google-mayday-update/comment-page-1/#comment-3505</link>
		<dc:creator>Francisco Acosta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 17:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattsmarketingblog.com/?p=1045#comment-3505</guid>
		<description>The point is clear. We all have to more clever in building our sites. Good luck to you all!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point is clear. We all have to more clever in building our sites. Good luck to you all!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sally</title>
		<link>http://mattsmarketingblog.com/general/google-mayday-update/comment-page-1/#comment-3498</link>
		<dc:creator>Sally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 22:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattsmarketingblog.com/?p=1045#comment-3498</guid>
		<description>I agree with Stuart, I hope it only weeds out the flimsy sites but not the genuine smaller ones.

I love the idea that hard work will be rewarded, there are too few people not willing to put in the hours to create great sites.

Sally :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Stuart, I hope it only weeds out the flimsy sites but not the genuine smaller ones.</p>
<p>I love the idea that hard work will be rewarded, there are too few people not willing to put in the hours to create great sites.</p>
<p>Sally <img src='http://mattsmarketingblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://mattsmarketingblog.com/general/google-mayday-update/comment-page-1/#comment-3493</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 03:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattsmarketingblog.com/?p=1045#comment-3493</guid>
		<description>Spunky Jones and Matt, what tools do you use to check articles for plagiarism?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spunky Jones and Matt, what tools do you use to check articles for plagiarism?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://mattsmarketingblog.com/general/google-mayday-update/comment-page-1/#comment-3492</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 23:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattsmarketingblog.com/?p=1045#comment-3492</guid>
		<description>This was bound to happen sooner or later. Since Google only has one first page we will see the bar raised higher and higher. A 20+ page site may be considered an authority this year, but next year it may not make page one depending on the competition. This is an opportunity for anyone who wants to focus and put in the work to rank.

Michael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was bound to happen sooner or later. Since Google only has one first page we will see the bar raised higher and higher. A 20+ page site may be considered an authority this year, but next year it may not make page one depending on the competition. This is an opportunity for anyone who wants to focus and put in the work to rank.</p>
<p>Michael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Carter</title>
		<link>http://mattsmarketingblog.com/general/google-mayday-update/comment-page-1/#comment-3488</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Carter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 03:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattsmarketingblog.com/?p=1045#comment-3488</guid>
		<description>Hey Aghper

I would not consider a 5 page site and authority, but would think a 20+ page that continually grows to be an authority in my opinion, and this is what I am going to focus on for my sites more from now on.

Thanks

Matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Aghper</p>
<p>I would not consider a 5 page site and authority, but would think a 20+ page that continually grows to be an authority in my opinion, and this is what I am going to focus on for my sites more from now on.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

